Sunday, 5 December 2021

Summary of In Search of Our Mother’s Garden

 BOOK TITLE: In Search of Our Mother’s Garden

AUTHOR: Alice Walker

AUTHOR HISTORY:

Born in Eatonton, Georgia on February 9th of 1944, Alice Malsenior Walker is a Black American novelist, essayist, poet and activist. She is most famous for her novel, The Color Purple, which was adapted into a film by Steven Spielberg in 1985. Her parents, Willie Lee Walker and Minnie Tallulah Grant were sharecroppers and had eight children, Alice being the youngest. She began school at 4-years-old, attending East Putnam Consolidated. In her teenage years, she attended the only high school available to Black youth, Butler Baker High School. She graduated as the valedictorian and enrolled in Spelman College after being awarded a full scholarship by the state of Georgia in honor of her academic achievements. She transferred to Sarah Lawrence College in New York after receiving a scholarship offer and used her time there to study abroad in East Africa. She began writing the poems that would eventually be compiled into her first book of poetry during this time as well. After graduating college in 1965, she worked as an educator and social worker, remaining heavily involved in Civil Rights efforts. Her expansive writing career also includes Temple of My Familiar, Possessing the Secret of Joy and Meridian, amongst others.

BOOK HISTORY:

In Search of Our Mother’s Garden: Womanist Prose was published in 1983 and as a collection of 36 essays written by Walker. The essays were a dynamic array of articles, reviews, speeches and other forms of prose written on various topics, using Walker’s womanist lens. She uses the pages of the text to explore the most pressing issues including the Civil Rights Movement of 1960s, anti-semitism, childhood and motherhood.

In Search Of Our Mother’s Garden: Womanist Prose is a collection of 36 essays, divided into four parts. As you explore this text, it is important that you take the time to consider the learning points of each chapter. Use the discussion questions to further interrogate the reading and expand your understanding of womanist concepts and ideologies.

Part 1

The opening section of Walker’s In Search of Our Mother’s Garden: Womanist Prose sets the pace for the overall thematic progression of the novel. The introductory essays found in the first section explore Walker’s relationship with Zora Neal Hurston’s work and Walker’s personal relationship with the Black southern landscape. These relationships encourage her to seek out the stories of Southern Black folks who have been forgotten and/or shunned throughout the course of history. She looks to Hurston as a beloved ancestor and travels to her hometown of Eatonville, Florida to uncover more of her work and personal history. "Saving the Life That Is Your Own: The Importance of Models in the Artist's Life" The first essay explores the artist’s need for models (understood to be role models; inspiration) and the difficulty of finding them. She begins this essay with a brief discussion of a quote found in a letter from Vincent Van Gogh to his friend, Emile Bernard. Written from a mental institution near the end of his life, Van Gogh wrote that he is “suffering from an absolute lack of models”. Walker interprets this as evidence of how serious Van Gogh took his art and subsequently, a commentary on the importance of having models for your work.

"The Black Writer and the Southern Experience"

In this essay, Walker continues the story she alluded to in the first essay. She begins with detailing her mother’s humiliation at a flour distribution center in the small Georgia town where they lived. Because her mother had dressed up to exchange vouchers for flour, the official—a white woman— refused to serve her, stating that she looked too prosperous to be on social welfare. Walker sees the story as an ultimately triumphant one, for the reason that her mother was able to lean on others in her community for flour: “In this small story is revealed the condition and strength of a people”.

Walker further states that this sense of community is an inheritance of the black Southern writer. Recalling her own rural Southern childhood, she writes that she is not nostalgic for poverty —her parents were sharecroppers—but for the sense of community and the closeness to the earth that her childhood nurtured in her. She recalls a “white Northern professor” suggesting to her that her childhood was not an adequate one for becoming a poet, and she refuted him for it.

• Walker’s mother is humiliated during a trip into town for flour, due to the clothing she decided to wear. She is ridiculed and turned away with the white woman saying that, “Anybody dressed up as good as you don’t need to come here begging for food.”

"But Yet and Still the Cotton Gin Kept on Working…"

This essay concerns Walker’s experience teaching at the Headstart Friends of the Children of Mississippi. This was a teacher-training program with no government funding, designed for the black children of Mississippi. Walker’s role was as a consultant and a mentor for these aspiring teachers, most of them poor and uneducated black women. In an effort to get these women to understand their own histories, so that they could then pass these histories on to the children that they taught, she had them write short testimonies about their experiences with racism in the South. The essay includes their segments from these testimonies, many of which deal with Klan violence, as well as the less organized violence of bigoted townspeople.

"A Talk: Convocation 1972"

“A Talk: Convocation” is a transcript of a graduation speech that Walker delivered at Sarah Lawrence College, her New York based alma mater. The speech, directed at young women and giving specific attention to young Black women, urges them to believe in themselves and to learn to face prejudice head on. Walker recalls her time editing the memoir of Mrs. Winston Hudson (detailed in the essay “‘But Yet and Still the Cotton Gin Kept on Working…’”) and cites Hudson’s own struggles with racism. She suggests that racism remains a problem even at a progressive college such as Sarah Lawrence and notes the scarcity of Black writers on the reading curriculum saying, “I am discouraged when a faculty member at Sarah Lawrence says there is not enough literature by black women and men to make a full year’s course […] It is shocking to hear that the only black woman writer white and black academicians have heard of is Gwendolyn Brooks”.

She does however go on to praise three formative teachers that she had while a student at Sarah Lawrence: her philosophy professor Helen Merrell Lynd, and the two poets and literature professors Muriel Rukeyser and Jane Cooper. She states that she learned from Lynd that even sadness and loneliness “have their use”; that Rukeyser taught her how to live bravely; and that Cooper taught her the value of listening and patience. She ends her speech by reading two original poems, entitled “Be Nobody’s Darling” and “Reassurance.”

• Black women’s experiences in higher education are often saturated with instances of violence on the basis of misogynoir, even when the institution hails itself as “progressive” and modern. In this case, how is progressivism used not only to mask, but to promote race and gender based violence and oppression in academia, work spaces or societally?

"Beyond the Peacock: The Reconstruction of Flannery O'Connor"

In this essay, Walker returns to her childhood home after becoming ill with lupus. Accompanied by her mother, the women decide to visit the Georgia house of Flannery O’Connor, one of her favorite writers. O’Connor’s home is not far from Walker’s own childhood home, which is now in a state of neglect and abandonment. Walker contrasts her old house with the tended state of O’Connor’s empty house saying,

“What I feel at the moment of knocking is fury that someone is paid to take care of her house, though no one lives in it, and that her house still, in fact, stands, while mine—which of course we never owned anyway—is slowly rotting into dust”.

 "The Divided Life of Jean Toomer"

This essay considers the writer Jean Toomer through a review of his collected writings, The Wayward and the Seeking. Many of these writings are autobiographical, and through them Walker comes to understand Toomer as a racial opportunist, embracing his blackness when it was convenient for him to do so and renouncing it when it became a burden. Toomer came from a mixed-race background and could generally “pass” as white. His most famous and influential novel, Cane, was concerned with the lives of Black Southerners, and in selling the book, Toomer emphasized the Black side of his own history. However, he refused to identify himself as Black when it came time to promote the book. He eventually married a wealthy white woman and moved with her to a Quaker community in rural Pennsylvania.

"A Writer Because of, Not in Spite of, Her Children"

This essay is a review of the novel Second Class Citizen by Nigerian writer Buchi Emecheta. While Walker finds the style of the novel plain and unremarkable, she considers it to be an important book for its frank and unusual depiction of the role of motherhood in the life of the female artist. The novel, which is semi-autobiographical, concerns an intellectually ambitious Nigerian woman who moves with her husband and children to London, where she must contend with open racism and sexism while raising five children. She ultimately transcends her circumstances not by pushing her children away, but rather by integrating them into her writing: she decides that she will write a novel, not for herself, but for the adults that they will become.

"Gifts of Power: The Writings of Rebecca Jackson"

This essay is a review of Jean McMahon Humez’s Gifts of Power. The book is a biography of the 19th century minister and mystic Rebecca Cox Jackson. Walker traces Jackson’s trajectory from a poor, illiterate girl in Philadelphia with an older minister brother to a spiritual leader in her own right. Jackson believed in divine visions and overcame her illiteracy by calling on the will of God to learn how to read the Bible. She later left her husband—also involved in her family’s African Methodist church—to establish a black Quaker community of her own. She lived with a younger woman, Rebecca Perot, until Perot’s death; the two may or may not have had a romantic relationship.

"Zora Neale Hurston: A Cautionary Tale and a Partisan View"

This essay is an appreciation of Zora Neale Hurston, whom Walker regards as a role model. She recalls coming upon her book ‘Of Mules and Men’ as a college student and being delighted by its portrayal of Black southerners. Hurston’s portrayal gave Walker’s own family history back to herself: “For what Zora’s book did was this: it gave [my family] back all the stories they had forgotten or of which they had grown ashamed […] and showed them how marvelous, and, indeed, priceless, they are.” Hurston is an important figure to Walker for her style and spirit, as much as for her writing. Walker notes that she was ahead of her time in her sexual independence/identity and also in her proudly African style of dress. At a time when most other Black American writers were modeling themselves on European intellectuals, Hurston was more focused on “Africa, Haiti, Jamaica, and—for a little racial diversity (Indians)—Honduras”. She frequently wore elaborate headwraps, a style that, as Walker notes, would become popular among black women in the 1960s.

Looking for Zora

In the final essay of part one, Walker travels to Eatonville, Florida- the hometown of her ‘model’, Zora Neale Hurston. She takes the trip with her friend Charlotte, a white Southern graduate who, like Walker, is interested in the literary and activist contributions of Hurston. Walker poses as the illegitimate niece and finds that while most of the townspeople remember Zora, their memories differ and often contradict each other. She is unsuccessful in her attempts to find the Hurston’s unmarked resting place, but she does leave with a renewed understanding of her roots in this all-Black community.

Part 2

Part Two consists of eleven essays and primarily focuses on the Civil Rights Movement and the various leaders within it. Through this collection of essays, she discusses the aims of the movement and describes her personal involvement while also exploring the positive and negative impacts and outcomes. She visits Hurston’s final resting place and in her honor, purchases a memorial plaque to place upon the previously unmarked site. As reverence leads much of the conversation in regards to Hurston’s literary ancestors, she also holds the Black southern landscape in high regard.

"The Civil Rights Movement: What Good Was it?"

In this essay, written when she was 23 years old, Walker defends the Civil Rights Movement against disaffected white liberals, who believe that it accomplished nothing. The central point of her essay is that the gains of the Movement are as much spiritual as they are material being that the Movement taught many black people to conceive of themselves, for the first time, as human and deserving. Walker also makes the point that Black people, unlike white people, do not have the luxury of giving up on the struggle for racial equality: “If the Civil Rights Movement is dead, and if it gave us nothing else, it gave us each other forever

"The Unglamorous but Worthwhile Duties of the Black Revolutionary Artist, or of the Black Writer

Who Simply Works and Writes"

This is a transcript of a speech that Walker presented to the Black Students’ Association at Sarah Lawrence College in 1970. She begins the speech by recalling her own time at the institution during her undergraduate years and how she appreciated the freedom she was afforded. She speaks about how she only later came to realize that her education there was one-sided. While she admired and loved many of her literature teachers there, she believes they did not expose her to enough Black writers, stating she “... began to feel that subtly and without intent or malice, I had been miseducated”

• Consider this quote:

“I have not labeled myself yet. I would like to call myself revolutionary, for I am always changing, and growing, it is hoped for the good of more black people. I do call myself black when it seems necessary to call myself anything, especially since I believe one’s work rather than one’s appearance adequately labels one.”

“The Almost Year”

This essay is a review of the novel “The Almost Year” by Florence Engel Randall. The novel itself is a combination of a ghost story and a realistic novel, concerning an underprivileged young Black woman’s year at the home of a wealthy white suburban family. While the family members are “well-intentioned”, they are of course unable to wholly connect with the girl. The girl then begins to see spirits in the family’s household, which for her, reaffirm her of her own slightly unwanted and awkward presence there. This plot twist  inspires both the girl and the family to connect with each.

Walker found the novel to be a realistically “warm” portrayal of a difficult human dynamic, and also to be “remarkably free of cant”. However, she finally understands it to be a conventional and limited effort, in that it does not push for or encourage long lasting social change, only for provisional moments of warmth between people of different social classes: “What one yearns for (and indeed must have if we are to share this earth as unashamed friends) is a […] family that is radically involved in changing society, not merely giving succor to its oppressed”.

"Choice: A tribute to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr."

“Choice: A tribute to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.” is the transcript of a 1972 speech that Walker delivered in a Jackson, Mississippi restaurant, which up until around that time, had refused to serve people of color. In the speech, she discusses King’s legacy and what it meant to her. The word “choice” in the speech’s title refers to what Walker sees as one of King’s greatest legacies: the fact that he made it possible for Southern black people like herself to remain in or return to the South based on their own decision. Walker states that prior to King, it was standard and practically expected for Black Southern people to leave their hometowns as they were generally driven away. Despite their attachment to the land, they were pushed away whether it be by poverty, racism, or overall heartbreak with the horrors of the American south. However, King, through his “acts” and “books,” was able to restore Black folk’s sense of connection to their land and furnished them with enough pride to claim it: “He gave us back our heritage”.

"Coretta King: Revisited"

“Coretta King: Revisited” is the title of an interview Walker held with Coretta Scott King, the widow of Martin Luther King, Jr. The interview takes place in King’s Atlanta home and is subtitled “revisited” as Walker recalls having interviewed her many years ago, prior to her husband’s assassination. She was a student at Spelman College at the time, one of a group of students who were on their way to the World Peace Festival in Helsinki, Finland. King herself was about to leave for a peace conference in Geneva.

Walker finds the older, widowed King to be more guarded and introverted than she had been, writing “The first thing I noticed was that her eyes have changed. They are reserved, almost cool, and she is tense; perhaps because she has been written about so often and because she is bored with it”.

Nevertheless, Walker still finds her to be an impressive force to be reckoned with, a beacon of light on her own terms. King remained involved in political campaigning and often sang in “Freedom concerts”. She directed the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Center, working out of the basement of their home and aided by Mrs. Farris, King Jr’s sister. Walker and King discuss feminism, social justice, and the role of non-violence in the Movement. The disengagement of many Black women with the feminist movement frustrates Walker, and she asks King for her thoughts on this to which King replies that she can understand why Black women might not want to concentrate only on women when they feel that their entire people need saving; however, she also believes that “[t]he Black woman has a special role to play”

"Choosing to Stay at Home: Ten Years after the March on Washington"

In this essay, Walker recalls her participation, as a college student, in the March on Washington, where she heard Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. speak. She contrasts the view of him that she had in Washington, as a powerful, charismatic speaker, with an earlier impression that she had of him when she saw him speak at Atlanta University: “It was a surprise […] to find at the March on Washington that the same voice that had seemed ponderous and uninspired in a small lecture hall was now as electrifying in its tone as it was in its message”. Walker recalls how King inspired her, and other Southern Black folks like her, to return to the South and to reclaim their Southern heritage. She remembers how, growing up poor and black in Georgia, she had often felt like “an exile in [her] own town”, despite feeling an overall connection to the landscape. As a young aspiring writer, she had always most loved and admired writers whose writing showed a connection to their landscapes and nonviolence, she maintains that “[i]t is very difficult to get people beyond the point of seeing nonviolence as something you do in marches and demonstrations.

"Good Morning, Revolution: Uncollected Writings of Social Protest"

This is a review of a collection of poems by Langston Hughes, edited by Faith Berry. The poems share themes of revolution and protest, and Walker notes that Hughes was little-appreciated as a poet of social change. She discusses Hughes’s interest in communism and his visits to Russia, which he wrote about in his essay, “The Soviet Union and Color.” He felt that communism solved the problem of racism, along with other societal problems, and that Russia as a society was more advanced than the United States.

 “Making the Moves and the Movies We Want”

This is a short review of a movie titled Countdown at Kusini. The movie was produced by Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. which at the time of writing, Walker hails as, “the largest black sorority in the world”. The movie, set in Nigeria, concerns a visiting musician who joins an anti-colonial uprising. Walker finds the movie flawed in some of its casting choices, but despite that element and its difficult subject matter, a worthy and inspiring work writing, “It is basically an upbeat, joyous film, with incredible vistas of Africa […] and African ceremonies, music, and customs. One leaves the theater ready to join the next revolutionary battle, not in dejection over how much there is to be done, but in awe of the possibilities for change once an oppressed people decides to rise.”

• Walker hopes that Countdown at Kusini will prompt the women of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. to continue producing meaningful films that shift the narrative. Specifically, she is hopeful that they will create “one movie a year”. While she is mildly critical of some content, she is more so pleased with the pushback against the disparaging narrative of Black women.

"Lulls"

This is a descriptive personal essay, concerning Walker’s visit to the South (Atlanta, Georgia and Jackson, Mississippi), although she is now living in Brooklyn. The title refers to “lulls” in political activity, and Walker’s focus is on the lives of people she knows in the South: family, neighbors, teachers, and former boyfriends, and the degree to which politics has altered or not altered these lives. Many of the people to whom she talks, for example, her childhood friend Joe Harris, have themselves lived up North and disliked it to the point where they returned home. Other people, such as her daughter’s old kindergarten teacher Mrs. Cornelius, have remained in the South and seem content with their lives and their roles in the community.

 “My Father’s Country Is The Poor”

This essay concerns a trip to Cuba that Walker made as a young woman, along with a group of Black American artists. The editors of a magazine called The Black Scholar sponsored them, while the Cuban Institute for Friendship among Peoples hosted them. The essay is interspersed with segments from memoirs by Fidel Castro, Ernesto Cardenal, and Angela Davis, as well as with poems and journal entries by Walker herself.

 

 

"Recording the Season"

This is a short essay concerning the seven years that Walker and her husband spent in Jackson, Mississippi, a time that was both joyous and challenging. Walker recalls the opposition that she and her husband, a white Jewish integrationist lawyer, faced there, as a racially mixed couple. She remembers the isolation and frustration that she felt as a new mother attempting to be a writer and the estrangement that she felt both from her racist neighbors and from “the scholarly type of revolutionary” who visited her and her husband from Boston. Walker locates her depression at that time as an uncertainty about the usefulness of her fiction writing, in this contentious climate.

Part 3

Section three includes eight essays focusing on issues pertaining to Black women and the political concerns of the Black American community. She tackles issues of self-worth and respect and aims to uplift Black women and men. Walker explores her relationship with other Black women artists who have used activism and prose to fuel their creative work. She explores Black women’s relationship with their self-definition. The title essay begins this section and explores the untapped creativity of older Black women- both enslaved and descendants thereof. “The garden” is a both literal and metaphorical symbol, elaborated upon more in this essay as Walker details the life of her own mother- an accomplished gardener.

"In Search of Our Mothers' Gardens"

The title essay explores the buried and often untapped creativity of an older generation of Black women- both enslaved and descendants thereof. The “garden” in the title is to be understood in both the literal and metaphorical sense. Walker’s mother, an accomplished gardener, would often draw attention from strangers who would pause to admire the beautiful blooms in front of her home. Walker viewed her mother’s gardening as her own way of “ordering the universe,” an instinct that she believed to be alive in all Black women, but that was not allowed to be expressed by enslaved Black women. Ultimately, she believes that the Black woman artist is expressing the thwarted and misplaced dreams and imaginings of her ancestors, her silenced mother and grandmothers.

"From an Interview"

These are excerpts from a 1973 interview with Walker, in which she discusses her life, beliefs, and work. The interview opens with her discussing a difficult period in her senior year of college, during which she was both pregnant and suicidal. Her college friends found her a doctor who would perform an abortion, and this period ultimately led to the writing and eventual publication of her first book of poetry, Once. Walker states that ever since this formative period, the writing of poetry has always come for her out of a feeling of sadness and despair. Walker also talks about her political commitments, which for her are linked to her art. She states that she “believe(s) in change: change personal and change in society” and that she has “experienced a revolution (unfinished, without question, but one whose new order is everywhere on view) in the South”.

"A Letter to the Editor of Ms."

This is a letter of appreciation, regarding a meeting of the National Black Feminist Organization, which featured the politician Shirley Chisholm—the first women to run for the Democratic nomination for the President of the United States in 1972. Walker finds this gathering special both because it is enjoyable and because it is rare for her to find such consensus and community: “I realized at the National Black Feminist Organization conference that it had been much too long since I sat in a room full of black women and, unafraid of being made to feel peculiar, spoke about things that matter to me”.

"Brothers and Sisters"

In this short personal essay Walker recalls the sexism she experienced during her poor, rural, Southern upbringing; a sexism that in different ways had an impact on both her brothers and she and her sisters. She recounts how sexist traditions and ways of living ultimately influenced the paths taken by her brothers and sisters, alike.

"If the Present Looks Like the Past, What Does the Future Look Like?"

In what many may view as the most contentious letter found within the text, “If the Present Looks Like the Past, What Does the Future Look Like?” concerns itself with the issue of colorism. According to Walker, colorism is “prejudicial or preferential treatment of same-race people based solely on their color”. Walker grapples with the issue as the mother of a biracial, light-skinned daughter and because of this, searches for a remedy writing that in order for Black people to be released from the issues of colorism, they must question this white imposed “fantasy” and “cleave to reality”.

"Looking to the Side, and Back"

In “Looking to the Side, and Back”, Walker interrogates the perception that the Black community has towards Black women who are trapped in abusive relationships. She believes that this lack of empathy is a result of the pressure placed on Black women to be both strong and resilient- a pressure that is imposed both societally and internally.

• At the time of this reading, are you able to pinpoint personal negative biases towards Black women who are currently in or at some point remained in an abusive relationship?

• Consider these quotations:

“They could take the black woman as invincible, as she was portrayed to some extent in my speech (what they heard was the invincible part), but there was no sympathy for struggle that ended in defeat. Which meant there was no sympathy for struggle itself—only for ‘winning’.”

“I was reminded of something that had puzzled me about the response of black people to Movement people in the South. During the seven years I lived in Mississippi, I never knew a Movement person (and I include myself) who wasn’t damaged in some way from having to put her or his life, principles, children, on the line over long, stressful periods. And this is only natural. But there was a way in which the black community could not look at this. I remember a young boy who was shot through the neck by racist whites, and almost died. When he recovered, he was the same gentle, sweet boy he’d always been, but he hated white people, which at that time didn’t fit in with black people’s superior notion of themselves as people who could consistently turn the other cheek. Nobody ever really tried to incorporate the new reality of this boy’s life. When they spoke of him it was as if his life stopped just before the shot.”

"To The Black Scholar"

This chapter is a letter to the editors of The Black Scholar, in response to an article by Dr. Robert Staples entitled “The Myth of the Black Macho: A Response to Angry Black Feminists”. His essay was a reponse to feminist sociologist Michelle Wallace’s book, “Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwoman”. Walker ‘calls out’ Staples and deems his actions reactionary and defensive, suggesting that “instead of arguing, at once, about whether there is or is not sexism in the Black community (and how could our community possibly be different from every other in that respect),” he should look around. She continues however by pointing out that while Wallace’s book has its imperfections, they are not the misogynistic issues alluded to by Staples. Instead, Walker pinpoints that Wallace has a “deep reluctance to criticize other Black women,” along with a reductive view of the “superwoman”.

"Brothers and Sisters"

In this short personal essay Walker recalls the sexism she experienced during her poor, rural, Southern upbringing; a sexism that in different ways had an impact on both her brothers and she and her sisters. She recounts how sexist traditions and ways of living ultimately influenced the paths taken by her brothers and sisters, alike.

Part 4

Silver Writes

The title of this section is a distortion of the term “Civil Rights”, a phrase that Walker finds to be bureaucratic and incapable of fully encompassing the contours of the struggle for Black liberation. She titles her poem Silver Writes, and uses this essay to delve into the meaning of the poem which she says, “... reveals why the term ‘Civil Rights’ could never adequately express Black people’s revolutionary goals, because it could never adequately describe our longings and our dreams, or those of the non-Black people who stood among us.”

Walker also notes that “Silver Writes” is how older, southern Black folks tended to pronounce “Civil Rights” and how they “did their best to instill what accurate poetry they could into this essentially white civil servants’ term.”

Only Justice Can Stop A Curse

This short essay concerns the anti-nuclear war movement and is ultimately a call-to-action for people of color to join the movement, rather than to give in to feelings of anger and helplessness about a disaster that they had no part in creating. Walker opens the essay with a lengthy and elaborate curse that she clarifies was collected by Zora Neale Hurston, in her capacity as an anthropologist. She then states that “I am sure it was a woman who first prayed this curse” and that her curse (which involves ruined farmlands and widespread sickness) is moreover coming to pass.

• This section opens with a curse-prayer by Walker’s model, Zora Neale Hurston. After reading this introduction, consider the role of religion and prayer in the Black south and in Black liberation movements? How does this curse-prayer deal with ideals of forgiveness often found in monothesitic religions? What is the significance of Walker both validating and honouring Hurston’s anger?

Nuclear Madness: What You Can Do

This essay is a consideration of the book Nuclear Madness, by the pediatrician and anti-nuclear activist Helen Caldicott. It is also, as its subtitle suggests, a call to action, and like the previous essay it particularly focuses on people of color: “As individuals we must join others. No time to quibble about survival being a ‘white issue’.

To The Editors of Ms. Magazine

This is a letter written in response to an article by Letty Cottin Pogrebin that appeared in Ms. Magazine, entitled “Anti-Semitism in the Women’s Movement.” Walker writes that while she has always been sympathetic to Jewish people, and feels that as an African-American woman she has in common with them a keen sense of social injustice, she does not approve of Israel’s actions in Palestine; nor does she support the idea that expressing disapproval is the same thing as anti-Semitism: “[People] are against [the war on Palestine] not because they hate Jews (though some of them may) but because they recognize and condone imperialistic behavior”.

Writing The Color Purple

This is an essay about Walker’s process of writing her novel The Color Purple, a novel that ultimately won both the Pulitzer Prize and the National Book Award and was made into both a movie and a musical. Walker writes about the restlessness and the financial difficulties that she experienced in writing the novel, as well as her bereft feelings once her novel was finished and her characters had “left” her. She began writing the novel in New York City and found that her characters would not “speak” to her in New York City, nor in San Francisco once she relocated there. It was only when she found a place in rural Northern California did her characters begin to express themselves: “And no wonder: it looked a lot like the town in Georgia most of them were from, only it was more beautiful and the local swimming hole was not segregated”. Walker’s daughter, who’d been staying with her father following their divorce, came to stay with her during the writing of her book. While Walker was initially worried that her daughter’s presence would be disruptive to her already lofty writing process and to both her and her characters, her daughter proved to be a stabilizing influence instead. Her daughter’s adventures in school even come to inform the plot of the book. She then left for summer camp, and Walker finished the novel on the day that she left.

Beauty: When the Other Dancer is the Self

This is an essay about Walker’s blind right eye which was the result of a childhood accident when one of her brothers shot her with a BB gun. She uses the space to write about how she came to terms with her partial blindness, which as a child and eventually a young woman, made her feel freakish and self-conscious. In the immediate aftermath of the accident, she withdrew and began to perform poorly in school, even while her family now repeatedly insisted that she “did not change” (366). A surgery that got rid of the white “glob” (364) in her afflicted eye helped to restore her confidence, and she went on to become an academically and socially successful high school student, earning the title of both valedictorian and homecoming queen.

One Child of One’s Own: A Meaningful Digression within the Work(s)

The closing essay of the text is about the role of motherhood in the female artist’s life. It begins with an excerpt from a speech that Walker delivered on Muriel Rukeyser Day at Sarah Lawrence College, where Rukeyser, a poet, once taught. In her speech, Walker praises Rukeyser as a teacher for her refusal to acknowledge divisions between things, including children and art: “She taught no separations where there are, in fact, none, which so much of the instruction in the world is expressly for. If the world contains War, it also contains The Child. If the world contains Hunger, Nuclear Reactors, Fascists, it also contains The Child”. Walker goes on to recount her personal experiences in early motherhood, and how she learned to perceive her young daughter, Rebecca, as an ally rather than a burden. This involved not listening to a lot of conflicting received opinions, which Walker regards as “Women’s Folly”, about both the ill-advised “wisdom” of (not) having children if one is an artist and the advisability of having more than one child so that they can “keep each other company” (374). Walker remembers being motivated to get pregnant largely so that her husband would not have to be drafted for the Vietnam War. She also recalls the difficult time spent as a single mother teaching in New England, while Rebecca was still a young girl as she herself was getting accustomed to motherhood and having to adjust to a frequently hostile and racist environment. Walker ultimately realizes that in an often harsh and unfair world, her daughter is a comfort, not a burden.

In Search of Our Mothers’ Garden

Alice Walker’s essay, In Search of Our Mother’s Garden, talks about her search of the African American women’s suppressed talent, of the artistic skills and talents that they lost because of slavery and a forced way of life. Walker builds up her arguments from historical events as well as the collective experiences of African Americans, including her own. She uses these experiences to back up her arguments formed from recollections of various African American characters and events. Walker points out that a great part of her mother’s and grandmothers’ lives have been suppressed because of their sad, dark pasts. But all of these are not lost because somehow, these are manifested in even the smallest things that they do, and that they were also able to pass it down to the very people that they loved. Our search of our mother’s garden may end back to ourselves.

Walker builds up her argument by mentioning the experiences of other people in the essay. One of them is Jean Toomer, a poet in the early 1920s. He is a man who observed that Black women are unique because they possessed intense spirituality in them, even though their bodies endure every aspect of punishment in every single day of their lives. They were in the strictest sense Saints – crazy, pitiful saints. Walker points out that without a doubt, our mothers and grandmothers belong to this type of people. By building up on the observations of Toomer, she was somehow able to show how hard it was to be a mother or a grandmother or even just a woman at that time, one reason perhaps is that they are black. The mothers and grandmothers at that time endured all of this without any hope that tomorrow will be different, be better. Because of this, they were not able to fully express themselves. They were held back by their society.

Another black character that she used to build her argument is Phillis Wheatley, a Black slave girl with a precarious health. Phillis is a poet and a writer at her own right, but unfortunately, she wasn’t able to do much with it because she was a slave. She didn’t have anything for herself, worse, she didn’t even own herself. Her futile attempts for self expression would be washed up by forced labor and pregnancies. She lost her health, and eventually her life without fully expressing herself through her gift for poetry.

Alice Walker used the story of Phillis to establish the understanding that indeed, African American women at that time were not allowed or didn’t have the luxury of time to exercise their gifts, to hone their talents and abilities, and use them to fully express themselves. By doing so, Walker proves that our mothers and grandmothers lived a boxed life back then, with no way to channel to them emotions and thoughts other than hard labor and forced servitude. She pointed out that we wouldn’t know if anyone of them would’ve bloomed to be poets, singers, actresses, because they never really had the chance to know what they can do.

By building up her argument using these two accounts, she is also presenting very strong evidence to her claim. These accounts were personal experiences of real African American people, and these are not just isolated cases. These are shared experiences not just by these two but by all of their people. Walker can confidently say that there is a lot of Phillis Wheatley in those times, perhaps including her mother and grandmothers. This is concrete evidence because it is not fictional, it is not imaginary, or something conceived out of Walker’s creativity. Slavery, forced pregnancies, poverty, and artistic suppression were the realities during the time of our grandmothers. No one can deny this, and no one can deny the existence of Phillis or the accounts of Jean Toomer.

    Considering Alice Walker’s authority in her arguments, she could be considered as an expert, a reliable source of information on the topic. First off, she is an African American woman, who had her fair share of poverty in her childhood. She was born and raised by hardworking parents, who really had to work day and night to provide for their family. Also, she witnesses first hand that even though her mother may not be a poet or a novelist; she was an artist in the truest sense. Her artistic side is manifested in her gardens and the beautiful flowers that she grows. Alice Walker witnessed all of this, experienced first hand what it was like to be poor and seemingly talentless.

 The accounts that Alice Walker used to prove her points and back up her arguments were African American history that she was all too familiar with. It may have been shared to her by her families, or simply a collective knowledge passed down from one generation to another. She is also well-educated, a wide reader, and an artist. She often cites Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own, relating a white woman’s plight to a black woman’s hardships. She emphasizes that even though she recognizes Woolf’s point about society’s unfair treatment to women of her time, Walker still believes that black women suffered the most (Walker). There is simply nothing that could compare to the artistic suppression that her mother and grandmothers experienced.

In this essay, she is appealing to a general audience, with no specific race or ethnicity. I think this essay was written to highlight the African American women of her mother and grandmother’s time, who were unable to express their talents and hone it to its full potential. This essay is written to inform anyone and everyone reading it about their stories, and of her discovery of her mother’s garden. She was glad to know that it is possible for African American women to express themselves even unknowingly, that it is up to us to discover these “gardens.” She is appealing to the readers in general that even though some people like our mothers and grandmothers seem talentless or artistically inferior, it doesn’t mean that they really lack the talent. It just means that were not looking hard enough to find it.

Alice Walker’s method of using personal experience and historical accounts allow her to truthfully see and say what has really happened. She doesn’t have to make up hypothetical events because she already has a basis for her arguments. Jean Toomer’s recollections and Phillis Wheatley’s experiences are enough proof of her argument. If some people would disagree with what she’s saying, she can always go back to their experiences, to how Phillis suffered without fully using her gift, or what Toomer saw in the streets in the early Twenties. But because of this, I think Walker is somehow limited to the sad and pitiful stories of the past. Well, in reality, most of the stories of African Americans were really sad and pitiful, but still, Walker failed to mention of any successful artist who rose from the ranks of slaves to write her own story. It is either this kind of story really didn’t exist at that time, or Walker just didn’t mention it, since it wasn’t the focus of her essay.

Alice Walker concluded her essay by saying that Phillis Wheatley’s mother was also an artist, and that the achievements of their daughters were in some way brought about by their mothers. Her conclusion states that the mother is somehow responsible in every achievement of their daughter. Any artistic output by a person is also a product of their mother. Indeed, their children are their best creations, their very own wonderful gardens. This conclusion is related to her method because it goes back to how Phillis Wheatley’s mother was somehow responsible for her daughter’s artistic sense, and that beyond the poverty and the hardships that our mothers and grandmothers experienced during their times, they were still able to artistically express themselves through their children, their very own wonderful gardens.

Themes In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens

 Womanism, Black Feminism and Feminism

                     The term 'Womanism' was first used by Alice Walker in her work In Search of Our Mothers' Gardens: Womanist Prose in 1983. Womanism and Feminism are not the same. The first is a movment of black American women who considered Feminism as a middle-class white women's movement that didn't take up the issues of the women of color. Alice Walker explains a womanist as:

v  A woman who loves and respects other women as well as society at large.

v  Considers women's sensitive, emotional make up as special fetures of women.

v  she attempts to strenghten the society and is committed to survival and wholeness of entire people, male and female.

v  A" Traditionally universalist… Loves music. Loves dance. Loves the moon. Loves the Spirit. Loves love and food and roundness. Loves struggle. Loves the Folk. Loves herself. Regardless.”                          

                          Womanism can be contrasted to feminism as the first celebrated womanhood, her role in society and supports the survival of all. It caters to the emotional, sensitive life of women and recognized the collective life of human society. It fought against racism, sexism and economic exploitation. Feminism, on the other hand, was a movement of middle class woman in 19th century which stood for the civil rights of women. The right to vote was one of the key concern of first generation feminism and it fought against sexism of male dominate society. Radical Feminists considered family, marriage etc...as economic institutions which intimidated women and supported homosexuality. Womanism suggests an alternative movement in which women confront gender, social oppression without leaving her inane womanist features.

           Black Feminism is a derivative of Feminism which worked for black women's social, political and educational rights in the US. It deals with women related issues of American women of color but lacks global perspective. It carries some of concerns of womanism such as recognition of African roots, method of defining black women's standpoint etc...

           Womanist concerns can be traced in the works of Tony Morrison, Bessy Head, Alice Walker and Ama Atha Aithu.  Ain't I a Woman? by Bell Hooks presents some of the key ideas of womanism.

Womanism and Alienation

Alice Walker in her essay “In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens” puts forward her thoughts on womanism. It is a social theory deeply rooted in the racial and gender oppression of black women. There are varying interpretations on what the term womanist means and efforts to provide a concise and all-encompassing definition have only been marginally successful. The ambiguity within the theory allows for its continuous expansion of its basic tenets. At its core, womanism is a social change perspective based upon the everyday problems and experiences of black women and other women of minority demographics, but more broadly seeks methods to eradicate inequalities not just for black women, but for all people. The self-authored spirit of activism, spirituality, and the women's relationship with herself, other women, and her surroundings comprise an essential part of the ideology. The term womanism was first coined by author Alice Walker in her 1979 short story, "Coming Apart".

In this essay, Walker elaborates on how black women felt over the subjugation of their authority and existence. They feel a certain sense of alienation from other social classes of society and they are seen differently and treated with inferiority. They are not provided with equal opportunities, and there is a clear distinction of what they are not. It is this alienation that makes the black women feel like a fallow expanse of land, devoid of rational or spiritual thought. The author describes how they have been abused physically, mentally and spiritually, to such an extent that their existence itself seems hollow and alien.

Plea of this Spirit: Women as a Sex Object

What I am has always been different from what you saw me as…and what I want is different from what you think I need…my spirit has been torn again and again by you and your friends, you’ve made me question my existence over time but there shall come a time when you’ll be forced to see me the way I’ve always wanted you to and at that time you will not be able to ignore it... That time it will be your heart that will tear on hearing the pain I have held in my breast over these years. And your plea will be unheard...

Women have always questioned their existence and pleaded for an angel saving their spirit from the eyes of the evil in this patriarchal society. Yet these pleas of theirs have always been turned down. For years they have been seen as a “sex object” and nothing else. Their talents were hidden from the world by not giving them a channel to use their energy for creating something beautiful. They were burdened with responsibilities of children, households and their husbands. Their lives were made to revolve around them and only them. Alice walker’s In search of our mother’s garden” showcases how black women in this world have been seen as a sex object.  In this essay, Walker begins with a quote by Jean Toomer, which shows how black men perceive a black women. They are always seen as a mere sex object. Alice walker’s stories have always thrown light on the problem black women had to go through. In the essay, Walker says that the society considered black women as a mule. This made them emotionless and hopeless. Readers can see this in Walker’s novel The Color Purple where she showcases incidents when Celie (the main character) is treated like a cattle and sexually abused by her step- father. Walker’s writing have made the world realized their mistake and has helped people to make a change.

The idea of the perception of women has always been a part of the writer and her work has made it hard for people to ignore the reality. The plea of those women is heard, now that she writes to express the pain that her sisters went through..

Subjectivity of Beauty

The theme I have chosen to work with, in relation with the essay “In Search of our Mothers’ Gardens” is the “subjectivity of beauty”.

Now this is quite a vast idea which works much beyond just this chapter. The subjectivity of beauty is an idea that has gained popularity since the mid-20th century especially with the rise of Black rights and equality.

“Black is Beautiful” was a slogan that became very popular at that point of time. The whites had a very firm idea of beauty and anything that was not “like” them was considered ugly, The Blacks, the Coloured people, everyone.

This set idea has been around for a very long time and will always remain. People will always consider some things beautiful and others ugly. Something that everyone needs to accept is the fact that beauty is subjective. Something which might be extremely ugly might be beautiful for me. Or vice versa. Beauty does lie in the eyes of the beholder.

This is why the whole concept of “Black is “beautiful” became a huge success. Just because some white people consider them ugly, it doesn’t make them ugly. People like Jean Toomer actually had the guts to come out and say that Black can be beautiful. Moreover beauty is more than just the physical appearance. What makes someone beautiful is what they are and not what they look like.

This is what the chapter deals with Inner beauty, spirituality, creativity and how inner beauty and creativity come out in the smallest of things someone does.

Racial Discrimination

What does it mean to be shunned and oppressed two times over – for being a black woman in a world that treats women like lesser beings and the dark-skinned as though they aren’t human? ‘In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens’ by Alice Walker explores the extent to which this discrimination went and shows how black women were stifled, forced to restrain and subdue their creative genius.

Women in general had to fight for their rights to break away from the confines of domestic life and what was expected of them, such as being an obedient wife, mother and dedicated housekeeper who only indulged in acceptable feminine activities like cooking, sewing and looking after the family. Black women, on the other hand, lived despondent lives affected by generations of thraldom, forced to believe they are truly inferior.

Walker draws this parallel by comparing the problems white women writers face according to Virginia Woolf’s ‘A Room of One’s Own’ with those that the black women undergo. While Woolf states that a woman needs a room of her own and money to support herself in order to write fiction, Walker points out that Phillis Wheatley, a slave in the 1700s who wrote poetry, didn’t even own herself. She shows how this long drawn-out discrimination morphed the truth for the blacks who grew up believing in their inferiority and that they were rescued from the savagery of Africa by the whites, like Phillis Wheatley who envisioned her mistress as a Goddess. Such ‘contrary instincts’ that went against their nature would deals blows to their health and sanity.

 

She also mentions that for most of the years that black people resided in America, it was a criminal offence for a black person to read or write. Therefore, any female black genius would be forced to internalize and subdue her creativity that madly urged to surge. And this wretched life devoid of passion and the flame of creativity and genius that refused to go out would eventually leave behind a burned soul that’s numb on the outside. And after ages of living like a puppet, some become empty shells staring vacantly, some forget what it means to be alive and some find a way – a secret outlet to channel their abilities the only way they can, through the only means open to them – be it knitting or gardening…

Insecurity

Alice Walker talks about insecurity among black women as one of the themes in her essay “In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens”. Walker is an American author and activist, brought up in an environment that heavily discriminated against the blacks, which is why most of her essays talk about her experiences of growing up as a black child in a white-dominated society.

It is basic human psychology that the lack of acceptance in society harbours a feeling of insecurity in the person. It is the same with the black immigrants in America since their arrival on the New Found Land in the early sixteenth- seventeenth century. They were brought in as slaves with no identity of their own and forced to work for the whites. Black women are called “the mule of the world” because they have been handed the burdens that everyone else refused to carry.

The author resonates the feeling of insecurity felt by black women due to their unjust treatment in society. She talks about the labels that is stamped upon them like “matriarchs, superwomen, mean and evil bitches, castraters and sapphire’s mama. Their character has been distorted and labelled them as infidels and just a mere object of physical satisfaction. The essay echoes with the insecurities that black women felt about their identities and it is portrayed through the songs of Bessie Smith, Billie Holiday, Nina Simone, Roberta Flack and others. It manifests in the creation of their art, an innate struggle to establish who they are and be able to stand up to what is wrongly projected about them.

Racial and Spiritual Identity

We, human beings, are a vast abyss of untold, unexplored perspectives. Every day, we discover a bit of ourselves and surprise ourselves in innumerable ways. Sometimes, we don’t realize our potential or worth but subconsciously direct that flow of energy into doing other things that manifest the presence of something that we believe is absent in us.

Alice Walker deals with a similar issue in her essay “In Search of My Mother’s Garden”, where she describes the richness and depth of spirituality and creativity of Black women and how it was suppressed by the whites. The question of one’s identity is explored as well. Black women were discriminated against and a stereotype was built surrounding their identity. Society manipulated and made them believe what they wanted them to believe, that Black women were incapable of Creation of history and art, that they were merely objects of procreation.

Their racial as well as spiritual identity is shown to be at stake. They are made to believe that they are a race inferior to their white counterpart by the accident of birth. Society creates unnecessary constructs around what is good or bad, right or wrong and it is on the basis of this that one’s racial identity is questioned. As their creative expression was stifled by such stereotypes, black women found another way to voice their spirituality and leave a mark of their identity: through the mediums her position in society allowed her to use. The handmade quilts, the well nurtured gardens that thousands of anonymous black women tended to is the legacy that is left behind of their existence. They were capable of lot more, of being able to produce great literature and art but circumstances did not allow so.

It is in these gardens of untold, unexplored perspectives that Alice Walker is trying to look for the racial and spiritual identities of the women long dead and gone.

Commentary on In Search of our Mothers’ Gardens

 In Search of our Mothers’ Gardens

Author: Alice Walker

Published by: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

“And so our mothers and grandmothers have, more often than not anonymously, handed on the creative spark, the seed of the flower they themselves never hoped to see – or like a sealed letter they could not plainly read.” —– Alice Walker; in her essay ‘In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens’

Throughout her literary life, Alice Walker has spoken about her mothers and grandmothers; women who were not saints, but artists living a life of spiritual waste. In an era of darkness and deprivation, when it was quite a punishable crime for people of Black origin to even read and write, the agony of these women who might very well have been poets, short story writers, painters and musicians remained unspoken, while they kept on toiling as unheard slaves in households year after year, decade after decade in a White dominated America. This was the America where Walker was born, where she eventually grew up. As an observant child, insightful adolescent and creative adult, she has witnessed all of this; the deprivation of creativity, the emptiness, the savagery these women were subjected to in their lives as Black southerners in the United States. She had felt the ensuing conflict between the pain of enduring unused and unwanted talent, and the numb, bleeding madness provoked by the springs of creativity in those brave women.

Later on, throughout the sixties and seventies, she writes a series of essays in which she reflects on the lives of these fiery African-American women of the past and how these women have had an impact on her literary pursuits. “In Search Of Our Mothers’ Gardens” consists of all of these works and even more, where she emphasizes on an identity, a spiritual connection she has discovered with these women, principally due to their exposure to the African culture. These women have searched for independence, creative and spiritual liberty and aesthetic fulfillment within their restrictive sociocultural milieu. Walker expresses the spark, the activities, the challenge found in the creative spirit of these women. It is amazing how she celebrates the lives of these phenomenal women, the Zora Neal Huston’s, the Rebecca Jackson’s, the Flannery O Connor’s as well as her own mother and grandmother; while she perceives their lives as unspoken inspirations in her own life.

In the exploration and analysis of Walker’s essays in the book “In Search of our Mothers’ Gardens”, it is essential that we look deep into the multiple themes of identity, historical racism, independence, and inspiration and the unique way she has dealt with all of these. A striking aspect of the book is the unique resonance of ‘womanism’ (a coinage by the author herself) in the chapters replete with her relentless search for black women’s roots and role models.

However much she addresses the themes of racism, civil rights movement, discrimination and the humiliation of the black southerners, what lingers in the mind after reading all the essays of “In Search Of Our Mothers’ Gardens” is her search for the root of spirituality in the Black Americans, especially the women writers. It is this search which makes her feel how these writers and phenomenal identities have been able to work and survive through many decades of abominable oppression and negligence. It is this search, which, critics have commented, has made her ‘refashion feminism into a new paradigm’, while addressing itself to the black American women of all classes.

Looking for Zora Neal Hurston, the forgotten Black woman writer, folklorist and anthropologist and rediscovering Zora in her unmarked grave several years after her death makes for a landmark in the book, particularly the way she has narrated all her efforts to reach through the mists of time, blow the dust away from the covers and reintroduce Hurston’s works into the mainstream of American literature. Hurston, a pioneer in Black feminist writing, whose path has been followed by black woman writers throughout the 70’s and the 80’s, has been the writer of two phenomenal novels (‘Their Eyes Were Watching God’ and ‘The Color Purple’) that embody the attempt to define and express the totality and essence of the Afro-American woman.

All the expressive, metaphoric speech of Hurston, her ability to explore and celebrate black life in its own terms, her attempts to challenge racism and oppression while focusing on a woman’s identity and spiritual fullness went into oblivion in a white society; and she was forced to choose a penniless death for herself in a Florida welfare home. However, the feeling of spiritual kinship asserts itself in the most unusual of ways. Little did Hurston know when she died that her bibliography or biography would be recovered years after her death, her legacy uncovered to the world and her grave located in the most unpredictable and dramatic turn of events.

It is in the chapters ‘Looking for Zora’ and ‘Zora Neale Hurston’ that Walker, the unknown friend and successor to Hurston, enacts the most spiritual task after her death,the reclamation of a fore-mother and the exploration of that mother’s literary ‘garden’. For Walker, the lines of “Mules and Men”, and the minor classics of Hurston, four published novels, two books on folklore and an autobiography–open up doors of a voyage of transforming vision, a voyage that unfolds the wisdom in Hurston’s writings that has transformed communal relations and spiritual lives.

 “This was my first indication of the quality I feel is most characteristic of Zora’s work: racial health, a sense of black people as complete, complex, undiminished human beings, a sense that is lacking in so much black writing and literature…..”

Years and decades ago, when Zora Hurston used to write about fruit pickers and hoodoo workers in sawmills and turpentine camps, and create an intimate picture of southern black rural life in America, little did she know that her writings would be analyzed thus by an unknown friend in a relentless attempt to craft a voice for black culture. For Walker, Hurston stands as the epitome for the oppressed black woman, providing the ‘cultural nourishment’ and ‘spiritual food’ for black women writers of all times.

Moreover, it is the particular affinity between the author and Zora Hurston in terms of both the language of black folk culture and the experience of the rural southern black women that makes Hurston’s works true to the spiritual, creative consciousness of the author.  Blind, unquestioned slavery and an uninterrupted dependence on a white society’s oppressive class system remained a persistent reality in Hurston’s times and her works. The two essays by Walker, ‘Looking For Zora’ and ‘In Search of Zora Neal Hurston’ represent the horizon that explores the powerful dimensions in the life of this phenomenal woman the world hardly recognized or knew.

In ‘Gifts of Power’, the writings of Rebecca Jackson’, Walker recounts lots of personal details and stories of the life of Rebecca Cox Jackson, a phenomenal black woman from Philadelphia, a preacher and Shaker leader, who wrote about her dreams and spiritual visions related to Christ’s miracles as well as mundane realities of everyday life. A charismatic itinerant preacher, Rebecca Jackson, the religious visionary writer, has recorded some immensely powerful religious awakening experiences in her spiritual autobiography ‘Gifts of Power’, which Alice Walker reviews with extreme care and precision. It is the voice of a powerful essayist, who, with a comprehensive coverage, attempts to present the scholarship and wisdom of such phenomenal women in the context of African-American feminism.

On the other hand, it is this comprehensive coverage of the various aspects of scholarship in these phenomenal women that makes ‘In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens’ a rich and diverse history of a quarter century of ‘womanist’ thought. Through the various chapters that delve into the subconscious and ever-present spirituality found in African-American women, particularly the chapters about Zora Neal Hurston, and ‘The Reconstruction of Flannery O’Connor’, ‘The Black Writer and the Southern Experience’, A Writer Because of, Not in Spite of, Her Children’, and the title-essay, she presents a bridge that hopes to connect the black women of the past and their quest to express their creativity and spirituality to the world.

What is more interesting is that in this voyage to discover the inherent spirituality in black Americans, Walker not only discovers the forgotten voice of Zora Hurston, but also returns to white American authors like Flannery O’ Connor whose writings, shunning white women as ridiculous and approaching black characters with unusual humility and restraint, had been discarded along the way. In the essay ‘Beyond the Peacock: The Reconstruction of Flannery O’Connor’, Walker presents a lucid, detailed account of her intimate visit to Andalusia Farm, home of Flannery O’Connor from her lupus diagnosis in 1951 until her death in 1964. While she undertakes a visit to the house along with her mother, her account of this visit in the essay presents a rich, intense spiritual journey of her own recognition that a segregated literature, such as she had been brought up since her days in Sarah Lawrence college, could no longer be tolerated, and both black and white writing had to be read alongside, intertwined with each other, as she describes in these lines:

“I would have to read Zora Hurston and Flannery O Connor, Nella Larsen and Carson McCullers, Jean Toomer and Willian Faulkner, before I could begin to feel well read at all”.

 

Flannery O Conner’s observations on race, class and time inspires Walker unknowingly over the years, and her visit to the home of O’Connor serves to lead the readers through time, forward or back, to eventually explore the Southern literary trail of O’ Connor, an exceptional writer whose works showed the courage to destroy the last vestiges of sentimentalism in White southern writing.

In the truest sense, all essays compiled within ‘In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens’ encompass the legacy of Sarah Lawrence college, an institution where she was taught “How to Be Shocked and Dismayed but Not Lie Down and Die” (A Talk: Convocation 1972). While writing about the generations of black mothers who lived and survived in the darkest depths of oppression, and yet managed to maintain their deep rooted spirituality intact, she conjures the power of back women in fiction and literary tradition, emphasizing a lot on the themes of identity, independence and inspiration.

As the reader reads through ‘In Search of Our Mother’s Gardens’, he witnesses Walker retrieving black women writers from oblivion, while at the same time spiritually growing with a unique power and humility, as she confronts the pieces of her own identity. It is the identity of the writer gifted with the spirit of self-indulgence and loneliness which sometimes turns out to be a radical vision of society.

“The writer-like the musician or painter”must be free to explore, otherwise she or he will never discover what is needed (by everyone) to be known. This means, very often, finding oneself considered “unacceptable” by masses of people who think that the writer’s obligation is not to explore or challenge, but to second the masses’ motions, whatever they are. Yet the gift of loneliness is sometimes a radical vision of society or one’s people that has not been previously been taken into account.” (‘From an Interview’)

            For Walker, being confronted with this gifted loneliness and writing about it is an enriching task which she undertakes by presenting writers of this ilk, including Jean Toomer and his work ‘Cane’, Zora Neal Hurston, and certainly, herself. Her work continues to bear testimony to the loveless marriages, the social discriminations, the slavery and the sexism of all times, while she continues with her faith in these phenomenal young black women of the past and present. She personally feels it is their rough, rocky road which she has traveled all her life and which she is still traveling, for which she writes:

“Be nobody’s darling; / Be an outcast. /Take the contradictions/ Of your life/ And wrap around you like a shawl/ To parry stones/ To keep you warm.” (A Talk: Convocation 1972)

Jean Toomer - In Search of Our Mothers' Gardens by Alice Walker -

                                 In Search of Our Mothers' Gardens by Alice Walker - Summary

Walker describes Jean Toomer's exploration of the Reconstruction South. Toomer found women sexually abused and lost, but who he saw to hold power, spirituality and beauty of which they were not aware. They were waiting for these unknowns to be made known. In the meantime they did not appreciate any aspects of life. These black women were artists whose creative forces were abandoned to the hardships of life.

Black women who were able to create such as Phillis Wheatley and Zora Hurston had divided loyalties, between black and white cultures. They were raised in both and their art is not genuinely hers but confused due to this. Many have criticized Wheatley's poetry for glorifying white people but Walker understands that art for Phyllis was a soulful practice and it sustained her.

This is not the end of the story, for the next generation of black women has survived. There is now the quest for black female identity. Society is not understanding of this strife.

The question arises of how so many women were in touch with their spirituality despite of the oppression and abuse.

Walker tells the story of her mother, who eloped at seventeen in the late 1920s. Walker is the youngest of eight children. Her mother worked tirelessly in the fields and at home all day. She found spirituality and creativity in her domestic undertakings, such as the planting of magnificent gardens, the only medium available to her. These expressions of creativity were anonymous, but they live on in Walker's stories. Not only the dry facts live on but their spirit. Walker feels an urgency to preserve them.

When her mother works in the garden, she is brilliant and radiant. She makes beauty within the poverty in which they lived. Such ability is characteristic of black women. Through this exploration of her mother's heritage she found her expressive creativity. In this way, many other mothers leave their marks on their children, and inspire them through the spirit and beauty that they recognized to create themselves.

In Search of Our Mothers’ Garden

 In Search of Our Mothers’ Garden

Alice Walker’s essay, In Search of Our Mother’s Garden, talks about her search of the African American women’s suppressed talent, of the artistic skills and talents that they lost because of slavery and a forced way of life. Walker builds up her arguments from historical events as well as the collective experiences of African Americans, including her own. She uses these experiences to back up her arguments formed from recollections of various African American characters and events. Walker points out that a great part of her mother’s and grandmothers’ lives have been suppressed because of their sad, dark pasts. But all of these are not lost because somehow, these are manifested in even the smallest things that they do, and that they were also able to pass it down to the very people that they loved. Our search of our mother’s garden may end back to ourselves.

Walker builds up her argument by mentioning the experiences of other people in the essay. One of them is Jean Toomer, a poet in the early 1920s. He is a man who observed that Black women are unique because they possessed intense spirituality in them, even though their bodies endure every aspect of punishment in every single day of their lives. They were in the strictest sense Saints – crazy, pitiful saints. Walker points out that without a doubt, our mothers and grandmothers belong to this type of people. By building up on the observations of Toomer, she was somehow able to show how hard it was to be a mother or a grandmother or even just a woman at that time, one reason perhaps is that they are black. The mothers and grandmothers at that time endured all of this without any hope that tomorrow will be different, be better. Because of this, they were not able to fully express themselves. They were held back by their society.

Another black character that she used to build her argument is Phillis Wheatley, a Black slave girl with a precarious health. Phillis is a poet and a writer at her own right, but unfortunately, she wasn’t able to do much with it because she was a slave. She didn’t have anything for herself, worse, she didn’t even own herself. Her futile attempts for self expression would be washed up by forced labor and pregnancies. She lost her health, and eventually her life without fully expressing herself through her gift for poetry.

Alice Walker used the story of Phillis to establish the understanding that indeed, African American women at that time were not allowed or didn’t have the luxury of time to exercise their gifts, to hone their talents and abilities, and use them to fully express themselves. By doing so, Walker proves that our mothers and grandmothers lived a boxed life back then, with no way to channel to them emotions and thoughts other than hard labor and forced servitude. She pointed out that we wouldn’t know if anyone of them would’ve bloomed to be poets, singers, actresses, because they never really had the chance to know what they can do.

By building up her argument using these two accounts, she is also presenting very strong evidence to her claim. These accounts were personal experiences of real African American people, and these are not just isolated cases. These are shared experiences not just by these two but by all of their people. Walker can confidently say that there is a lot of Phillis Wheatley in those times, perhaps including her mother and grandmothers. This is concrete evidence because it is not fictional, it is not imaginary, or something conceived out of Walker’s creativity. Slavery, forced pregnancies, poverty, and artistic suppression were the realities during the time of our grandmothers. No one can deny this, and no one can deny the existence of Phillis or the accounts of Jean Toomer.

Considering Alice Walker’s authority in her arguments, she could be considered as an expert, a reliable source of information on the topic. First off, she is an African American woman, who had her fair share of poverty in her childhood. She was born and raised by hardworking parents, who really had to work day and night to provide for their family. Also, she witnesses first hand that even though her mother may not be a poet or a novelist; she was an artist in the truest sense. Her artistic side is manifested in her gardens and the beautiful flowers that she grows. Alice Walker witnessed all of this, experienced first hand what it was like to be poor and seemingly talentless.

The accounts that Alice Walker used to prove her points and back up her arguments were African American history that she was all too familiar with. It may have been shared to her by her families, or simply a collective knowledge passed down from one generation to another. She is also well-educated, a wide reader, and an artist. She often cites Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own, relating a white woman’s plight to a black woman’s hardships. She emphasizes that even though she recognizes Woolf’s point about society’s unfair treatment to women of her time, Walker still believes that black women suffered the most (Walker). There is simply nothing that could compare to the artistic suppression that her mother and grandmothers experienced.

In this essay, she is appealing to a general audience, with no specific race or ethnicity. I think this essay was written to highlight the African American women of her mother and grandmother’s time, who were unable to express their talents and hone it to its full potential. This essay is written to inform anyone and everyone reading it about their stories, and of her discovery of her mother’s garden. She was glad to know that it is possible for African American women to express themselves even unknowingly, that it is up to us to discover these “gardens.” She is appealing to the readers in general that even though some people like our mothers and grandmothers seem talentless or artistically inferior, it doesn’t mean that they really lack the talent. It just means that were not looking hard enough to find it.

Alice Walker’s method of using personal experience and historical accounts allow her to truthfully see and say what has really happened. She doesn’t have to make up hypothetical events because she already has a basis for her arguments. Jean Toomer’s recollections and Phillis Wheatley’s experiences are enough proof of her argument. If some people would disagree with what she’s saying, she can always go back to their experiences, to how Phillis suffered without fully using her gift, or what Toomer saw in the streets in the early Twenties. But because of this, I think Walker is somehow limited to the sad and pitiful stories of the past. Well, in reality, most of the stories of African Americans were really sad and pitiful, but still, Walker failed to mention of any successful artist who rose from the ranks of slaves to write her own story. It is either this kind of story really didn’t exist at that time, or Walker just didn’t mention it, since it wasn’t the focus of her essay.

            Alice Walker concluded her essay by saying that Phillis Wheatley’s mother was also an artist, and that the achievements of their daughters were in some way brought about by their mothers. Her conclusion states that the mother is somehow responsible in every achievement of their daughter. Any artistic output by a person is also a product of their mother. Indeed, their children are their best creations, their very own wonderful gardens. This conclusion is related to her method because it goes back to how Phillis Wheatley’s mother was somehow responsible for her daughter’s artistic sense, and that beyond the poverty and the hardships that our mothers and grandmothers experienced during their times, they were still able to artistically express themselves through their children, their very own wonderful gardens.

Friday, 1 October 2021

NORTHROP FRYE: THE ARCHETYPES OF LITERATURE

 NORTHROP FRYE: THE ARCHETYPES OF LITERATURE

Click here to read original essay

Introduction

Northrop Frye was born in Canada in 1921 and studied at Toronto University and Merton College, Oxford University. Initially he was a student of theology and then he switched over to literature. He published his first book, Fearful Symmetry: A Study of William Blake in 1947. The book is a highly original study of the poetry of Blake and it is considered a classic critical work. Northrop Frye rose to international prominence with the publication of Anatomy of Criticism, in 1957 and it firmly established him as one of the most brilliant, original and influential of modern critics. Frye died in 1991. On the whole, he wrote about twenty books on Western literature, culture, myth, archetypal theory, religion and social thought. The Fables of Identity: Studies in Poetic Mythology is a critical work published in 1963. The present essay, “Archetypes of Literature,” is taken from the book. In the essay Frye critically analyses literature against the backdrop of rituals and myths. He interprets literature in the light of various rituals and myths. Frye has divided the easy into three parts. The first part deals with the concept of archetypal criticism. The second part throws light on the inductive method of analysis of a text. The third part focuses on the deductive method of analysis. All the methods fall under structural criticism.

 

Part-I THE CONCEPT OF ARCHETYPAL CRITICISM

Literature can be interpreted in as many ways as possible, and there are different approaches to literature, and one among them is the archetypal approach. The term “archetype” means an original idea or pattern of something of which others are copies. Archetypal approach is the interpretation of a text in the light of cultural patterns involved in it, and these cultural patterns are based on the myths and rituals of a race or nation or social group. Myths and rituals are explored in a text for discovery of meaning and message. In recent times this type of critics. approach to a text has gained popularity. James George Frazer and Carl Gustav Jung are the two great authorities who, have greatly contributed to the development of archetypal approach. Frazer was a social anthropologist and his book The Golden Bough makes a study of magic, religion and myths of different races. Jung was a psychologist associated with Freud. The “collective consciousness” is a major theory of Jung. According to Jung, civilized man “unconsciously” preserves the ideas, concepts and values of life cherished by his distant forefathers, and such ideas are expressed in a society’s or race’s myths and rituals. Creative writers have used myths in their works and critics analyze texts for a discovery of “mythological patterns.” This kind of critical analysis of a text is called archetypal criticism. T.S. Eliot has used mythical patterns in his creative works and The Waste Land is a good example of it. Northrop Frye in his essay does not analyze any particular myth in a work and in fact, he presents an analysis of “mythical patterns” which have been used by writers in general.

 

Two Types of Criticism and the Humanities

Like science, literary criticism is also a systematized and organized body of knowledge. Science dissects and analyses nature and facts. Similarly literary criticism analyses and interprets literature. Frye further says that literacy criticism and its theories and techniques can be taught, but literature cannot be taught, rather it is to be felt and enjoyed. Indeed, literary criticism is like science and it can be creative. There are two types of literary criticism: a significant and meaningful criticism, and a meaningless criticism. A meaningless criticism will not help a reader in developing a systematic structure of knowledge about a work of literature. This kind of criticism will give only the background information about a work. A meaningless criticism will distract the reader from literature. Literature is a part of humanities and humanities include philosophy and history also. These two branches of knowledge provide a kind of pattern for understanding literature. Philosophy and history are two major tools- for interpretation of literature and archetypal criticism is based on philosophy and history of a people. Archetypal criticism is meaningful criticism.

Formalistic Criticism & Historical Criticism

There are different types of criticism and most of them remain commentaries on texts. There is a type of criticism, which focuses only on an analysis of a text. Such a criticism confines itself to the text and does not give any other background information about the text. This type of formalistic or structural criticism will help the readers in understanding a text only to some extent. That is, a reader may understand the pattern of a text, but how the pattern is evolved, he cannot understand without the background information, which may be called historical criticism. Structural criticism will help a reader in understanding the pattern of a text and historical criticism will make the reader’s understanding clearer. What the readers require today is a synthesis of structural criticism and historical criticism. Archetypal criticism is a synthesis of structural criticism and historical criticism.

Literary Criticism is a Science

Science explores nature and different branches of science explore different aspects of nature. Physics is a branch of science, which explores matter and natural forces of the universe. Physics and Astronomy gained their scientific significance and they were accepted as branches of science during the Renaissance. Chemistry gained the status of science in the eighteenth century, and so did Biology in the nineteenth century. Social Sciences assumed their significance as part of science in the twentieth century. Similarly, literary criticism, today, has become systematic in its analysis, and therefore it could be considered as a science. Based on this concept, a work of literature may be critically (or scientifically) evaluated, says Northrop Frye. Among the tools of criticism, he uses the two methods: structural criticism and historical criticism. The two concepts, he explains in detail in the second and third parts of this critical essay respectively.

 

                                                                      Part-II

THE INDUCTIVE METHOD OF ANALYSIS Structural Criticism and Inductive Analysis

Towards the close of the first section, Frye contends that structural criticism will help a reader in understanding a text, and in his analysis, he proceeds inductively. That is, from particular truths in a work, he draws forth general truths. Owing to jealousy, Othello, in the Shakespearean play, inflicts upon himself affliction and this is the particular truth of the drama from which the reader learns the general truth of life that jealousy is always destructive. This is called the inductive method of analysis under structural criticism, and Frye discusses this in detail in this section of the essay. An author cannot intrude into his text and express his personal emotions and comments. He should maintain absolute objectivity. A critic studies a work and finds out whether an author is free from textual interference. This is a sort of psychological approach also, and this method of criticism helps the reader in understanding an author’s personal symbols, images and myths which he incorporates in his works. At times the author himself may be unconscious of the myths, symbols etc., which he has exploited in his works, and the critic “discovers” such things.

 

Historical Criticism and Inductive Analysis

Under the second type of criticism called historical criticism, a critic interprets the birth of a text and resolves that it is an outcome of the social and cultural demands of a society in a particular period. The social and cultural milieus are the causes responsible for the creation of a work. Quite evidently the historical-critic plays a major role in the understanding of a text. In fact, both structural criticism and historical criticism are a necessity in archetypal criticism and neither can be dispensed with. But either of them alone does not explain a work completely. A historical critic discovers common symbols and images being used by different writers in their works, and resolves that there must be a common ‘source from which writers have derived their symbols, images and myths. The sea is a common symbol used by many writers over the years and therefore it is an archetypal symbol. Not only symbols, images and myths are archetypal; even genres are archetypal. For example, the genre of drama originates from Greek religion. Thus the historical inductive method of criticism helps the readers in understanding not only symbols, images and myths, but also the very genre itself.

The Collective Unconscious or Racial Memory

Archetypal criticism dissects and analyses symbols, images and mythologies used by a writer in his works, and these symbols, myths and rituals have their origin in primitive myths, rituals, folk-lore and cultures. Such primitive factors according to Jung lie buried in the “collective unconscious” which may otherwise be called “racial memory” of a people. Since a writer is part of a race, what lies in his “unconscious” mind is expressed in his works in the form, of myths, rituals, symbols and images. Archetypal criticism focuses on such things in a work. In archetypal criticism, under the reductive method of analysis, a critic, while elucidating a text, moves from the particular truth to the general truth. A particular symbol or myth leads to the establishment of a general truth. Works of art are created in this way and their origin is in primitive cultures. Literature is produced in this manner over the years.

Archetypal Criticism and Its Facets

Archetypal criticism is an all-inclusive term. It involves the efforts of many specialists, and at every stage of interpretation of a text, it is based “on a certain kind of scholarly organization.” An editor is needed to “clean up” the text; a rhetorician analyses the narrative pace; a philologist scrutinizes the choice and significance of words; a literary social historian studies the evolution of myths and rituals. Under archetypal criticism the efforts of all these specialists converge on the analysis of a text. The contribution of a literary anthropologist to archetypal criticism is no small. In an archetypal study of Hamlet an anthropologist traces the sources of the drama to the Hamlet legend described by Saxo, a thirteenth century Danish historian in his book entitled Danes, Gesta Danorum. He further traces the sources of the drama to nature myths, which were in vogue in the Norman Conquest period. Thus an anthropologist makes a threadbare analysis of the origins of Hamlet under archetypal criticism.

Part - III

DEDUCTIVE METHOD OF ANALYSIS Rhythm and Pattern in Literature

An archetypal critic, under the deductive method of analysis, proceeds to establish the meaning of a work from the general truth to the particular truth. Literature is like music and painting. Rhythm is an essential characteristic of music and in painting, pattern is the chief virtue. Rhythm in music is temporal and pattern in painting is spatial. In literature both rhythm and pattern are recurrence of images, forms and words. In literature rhythm means the narrative and the narrative presents all the events and episodes as a sequence and hastens action. Pattern in literature signifies its verbal structure and conveys a meaning. In producing the intended artistic effect, a work of literature should have both rhythm (narrative) and pattern (meaning).

Rhythm in a Work

The world of nature is governed by rhythm and it has got a natural cycle. The seasonal rhythms in a solar year are spring, winter, autumn and summer. This kind of rhythm is there in the world of animals and in the human world also. The mating of animals and birds rhythmically takes place in a particular season every year and the mating may be called a ritual. A ritual is not performed frequently, but rhythmically after a long gap and it has a meaning. The mating of animals has the meaning of reproduction. In the world of nature also rituals are rhythmic. Crops are planted and harvested rhythmically every year and they have their seasons. At the time of planting and harvest, sacrifices and offerings are made and they have a meaning: fertility and consummation of life. In the human world rituals are performed voluntarily and they have their own significance. Works of literature have their origins in such rituals and the archetypal critic discovers and explains them. He explains the rhythm of the rituals, which are the basis of literature in general.

Pattern in a Work

It has already been established that in literature pattern is recurrence of images, forms and words. Patterns are derived from a writer’s “epiphanic moments.” That is, a writer gets the concepts of his work or ideas of his work in moments of inspiration and he looks into the heart of things. Then he expresses what he has “perceived” in the form of proverbs, riddles, commandments and etiological folktales. Such things have already an element of narrative and they add further to the narrative of the writer in his works. A writer expresses what he has “perceived,” and he uses myths either deliberately or unconsciously, and it is the critic who discovers the archetypes, the myths, in a work and explicates the patterns in the work. Both pattern and rhythm are the major basic components of a work.

The Four Phases of the Myth

Every myth has a central significance and the narrative in a myth centres on a figure that may be a god or demi-god or superhuman being or legend. Frazer and Jung contend that in the development of a myth the central figure or central significance is the most important factor and many writers have accepted this view. Frye classifies myths into four categories:

1. The dawn, spring and birth phase. There are myths dealing with the birth of a hero, his revival and resurrection, defeat of the powers of darkness and death. Subordinate characters such as the father and the mother are introduced in the myth. Such myths are the archetypes of romance and of rhapsodic poetry.

2. The zenith, summer and marriage or triumph phase. In this phase, there are myths of apotheosis, (the act of being raised to the rank of a god), of sacred marriage and of entering into Paradise. Subordinate characters in these myths are the companion and the bride. Such myths are the archetypes of comedy, pastoral and idyll.

3. The sunset, autumn and death phase. These are the myths dealing with the fall of a hero, a dying god, violent death, sacrifice and the hero’s isolation. The subordinate characters are the traitor and the siren. Such myths are the archetypes of tragedy and elegy.

4. The darkness, winter and desolation phase. There are myths dealing with the triumph of these powers. The myths of floods, the return of chaos and the defeat of the hero are examples of this phase. The ogre and the witch are the subordinate characters here and these myths are the archetypes of satire.

These are the four categories of myths, which Frye identifies and they recur in different types of works written by different writers. Indeed they constitute the bases of many great pieces of literature.

Quest - Myth

In addition to the four categories of myths mentioned above, Northrop Frye discusses the quest-myth also which was supposed to have been developed from the four types of myths. In the quest-myth, the hero goes in quest of a truth or something else, and this type of myth recurs in all religions. For example, the Messiah myth is a quest myth of the Holy Grail (a Christian myth) in the last part of The Waste Land. Sacred scriptures of all religions have their own myths and an archetypal critic will have to examine them closely for an appropriate interpretation of texts. From an analysis of the archetypes of myths, a critic can descend to make a study of the genres and from the genres he can further descend to the elucidation of a text in terms of myth. This type of dissension in criticism is called the deductive method of analysis. That is, the critic moves from the general truth (a myth) to an elucidation of the particular truth (the truth of why a character behaves so) in a text. In this way a critic can analyse from myths how a drama or a lyric or an epic has been evolved. Frye further says that, almost all genres in every literature have been evolved from the quest-myth only. It is the duty of an archetypal critic to analyse myths and establish the meaning and message of a work.

Literary Criticism and Religion

There is a close relationship between literary criticism and religion. In his analysis, a literary critic considers God as an archetype of man who is portrayed as a hero in a work. God is a character in the story of Paradise Lost or The Bible, and the critic deals with Him and considers Him only as a human character. Criticism does not deal with any actuality, but with what is conceivable and possible. Similarly religion is not associated with scientific actuality, but with how things look like. Literary criticism works on conceivability. Likewise, religion functions on conceivability. There can be no place for scientific actuality in both, but what, is conceived is accepted by all. Both in religion and literary criticism, an epiphany is at work. It is a revelation of God or truth and it is a profound insight. It originates from the subconscious, from the dreams. In human life there is a cycle of waking and dreaming and in nature also, it could be seen and it is the cycle of light and darkness. Waking and dreaming, and light and darkness are two antithetic factors, which bring about epiphany in a person. It is during the day that man develops fear and frustration, and it is in the dark of the night his libido, the strong force of life, awakens and he resolves to achieve. It is the antithesis, which resolves the problems and misunderstandings of man and makes him perceive truth both in religion and literary criticism.

The Comic Vision and the Tragic Vision in a Myth

Both art and religion are alike and they aim at perfection. Perfection is the end of all human efforts. In art it is achieved through dreaming (imagination) and in religion it is through visualization. Perfection can be achieved in literary criticism also and it is the archetypal critic who does it through an analysis of the comic vision of life and the tragic vision as well in a work. The central pattern of the comic vision and the tragic vision in a myth is detailed below:

1. In the comic vision of life, in a myth, the “human” world is presented as a community, or a hero is portrayed as a representative of the desires of the reader.

Here the archetypes of images are symposium, communion, order, friendship, and love. Marriage or some equivalent consummation belongs to the comic vision of life.

In the tragic vision of life, in the “human” world, there is tyranny or anarchy, or an individual or an isolated man, or a leader with his back to his followers or a bullying giant of romance, or a deserted or betrayed hero. In addition to these, there will be a harlot or a witch or other varieties of Jung’s “terrible mother” in the tragic vision of life.

2. In the comic vision of life in a myth, the “animal” world is presented as a community of domesticated animals, usually a flock of sheep, or a lamb, or one of the gentler birds (usually a dove). The archetypes of images are pastoral images. In the tragic vision of life, in the “animal” world there are beasts, birds of prey, wolves, vultures, serpents, dragons and so on.

3. In the comic vision of life, in the “vegetable” world of a myth, there is a garden, a grove or park, or a tree of life, or a rose or lotus. The examples of the archetypes of Arcadian images are Marvell’s green world and Shakespeare’s forest comedies.

In the tragic vision of life, in the “vegetable” world of a myth, there is a sinister forest like the one in Milton’s Camus or at the opening of Dante’s Inferno, or a heath or wilderness, or a tree of death.

4. In the comic vision of life, in the “mineral” world of a myth, there is a city, or one building or temple, or one stone, normally a glowing precious stone. These are presented as luminous or fiery. The example of the archetype of image is a “starlit dome.”

In the tragic vision of life, the “mineral” world of a myth is seen in terms of deserts, rocks and ruins, or of geometrical images like the cross.

5. In the comic vision of life, in the “unformed” world of a myth, there is a river, traditionally fourfold, which influenced the Renaissance image of the temperate body with its four humours.

In the tragic vision of life, this world usually becomes the sea, as the narrative myth of dissolution is so often a flood myth. The combination of the sea and beast images gives us the leviathan and similar water-borne monsters.

After discussing the central pattern of the comic vision and the tragic vision in a myth, Frye introduces W.B. Yeats’ “Sailing to Byzantium” as a befitting and famous example of the comic vision which, in the poem, is represented by the city, the tree, the bird, the community of sages, the geometrical gyre and the detachment from the cyclic world. It is either tragic or comic vision of life which determines the interpretation of a symbol or myth, says Frye.

Conclusion

Of the different approaches of literary criticism, Northrop Frye has established the validity of the archetypal approach and its relevance in the elucidation of a text. Like works of literature, criticism is also creative and an archetypal critic discovers the meaning of a text and the motives of a character. No human endeavor is independent and the work of an archetypal critic is inclusive of formalistic criticism (or structural criticism) and historical criticism. Both J.G. Frazer and C.G. Jung opened up new vistas in archetypal or mythical criticism and Frye has obviated the impediments in the appreciation of a text. In mythical criticism, both the inductive method and the deductive method are effective tools and neither can be dispensed with, according to Frye. If one method explains a text based on the derivation of a general truth from the particular, the other method does it the other way round. Both the methods are complementary, and if either of them is unexploited, archetypal criticism will be incomplete. Archetypal approach to a text has contributed to the establishment of a systematic and comprehensive concept of literary criticism.


Friday, 13 March 2020

Why the Novel Matters - D. H. Lawrence

Why the Novel Matters
D. H. Lawrence’s critical essay ‘Why the novel matters’ was published in the collection titled Phoenix in the year 1936. In this essay Lawrence speaks about the importance of the novel and tries to establish the superiority of the novelist above other professions.

In an attempt to illustrate the importance of the novel Lawrence explains the importance of life and the living man. He says that the whole living man, the man alive, is more important than his thoughts, ideas, his mind, or his stomach or liver or kidney or any other parts of his body. Lawrence says that this is what scientists and philosophers fail to understand. According to Lawrence a novel shows life and its characters are nothing but man alive. The novelist understands the importance of life and the man alive. Therefore the novelist is better than the scientist or the philosopher.

Lawrence begins the essay by commenting upon the saying ‘a sound mind in a sound body’. He calls it a funny superstition that people think of themselves as a body with a soul in it. He questions why one thinks of one’s hand as something subordinate to the mind that operates it. The hand has a life of its own. It has knowledge and can think and act for itself. The hand is as much a part of the living man as the mind. The pen held by the hand however is not alive. A man alive extends only to his fingertips. Lawrence says that whatever in a man is alive constitutes the man alive. The hand, skin, freckles, blood and bones are very much alive and part of the man alive. The living body therefore must not be compared to inanimate objects like tin cans or clay vessels.

Lawrence in this essay tries to explain why the novelist is better than the philosopher or the scientist and in order to do so he explains the importance of the man alive. According to Lawrence the novelist possesses an intricate understanding of the man alive more fully than a parson, a philosopher, or a scientist. The parson speaks about souls in heaven and the afterlife. But for the novelist heaven is in the palm of his hand and the tip of his nose which are alive. The novelist is not concerned about life after death. He is wholly concerned about life at present and with the man alive. The philosopher speaks about infinite knowledge possessed by the pure spirit.  But for the novelist there is no knowledge beyond what the living body can perceive. For philosophers nothing but thoughts is important. These thoughts Lawrence says are nothing but ‘tremulations on the ether’. They are not alive. They are like radio signals floating in the air which are meaningless until they reach the receiver – a radio device that decodes the signals into a meaningful message. Similarly when thoughts are received by a man alive they become meaningful and can alter the man’s life. But the thoughts nevertheless are not alive. It is only because the man alive receives them that they become alive. Only a man alive can be stimulated by thoughts. Thus the living body is more important than the message conveyed by thoughts.

According to Lawrence nothing is more important than life. Living things are more valuable than dead objects. A living dog is better than a dead lion but a living lion is better than a living dog. Lawrence says that scientists and philosophers find it difficult to accept the value of the living. For the philosopher nothing but thoughts matter. For the scientist a living man is of no use. He only wants a dead man whom he dissects and observes under the microscope. For a scientist a man is a heart, a liver, a kidney, a gland or a tissue. But for the novelist the only thing that matters is a whole living man. Lawrence refuses to believe that he is a body or a soul or a brain or a nervous system. He considers himself to be a complete whole made up of all these parts, a whole that is greater and more significant than the individual parts. And for this reason he is a novelist and he considers himself superior to the saint, the scientist or the philosopher.   

Having established the importance of the man alive and the novelist Lawrence proceeds to explain the significance of the novel. Lawrence calls the novel a book of life. According to him books are like thoughts - nothing but ‘tremulations on the ether’. They are meaningful only when a man alive receives them. But he says that the tremulations of a novel are more powerful than any other book and it can make a whole man alive tremble. This means that the novel has the capacity to influence a man more effectively than any other book.  For example the ideals of Plato makes the ideal being in a man tremble. Similarly the sermons or the Ten Commandments affect only a part of a man alive. But a novel is capable of shaking the whole of a man alive. This is because a novel deals in nothing else but man alive. In this regard Lawrence calls the Bible a ‘great confused novel’.  All its characters – Adam, Eve, Sarai, Abraham, Isaac – including God are nothing but man alive. For Lawrence, the Bible, Homer and Shakespeare are all great novels because they communicate to the reader. Their wholeness affects the whole of man alive. They do not stimulate growth in a particular direction but shake the whole man alive into new life.

According to Lawrence the strength and appeal of a novel lies in the dynamic nature of its characters which reflects the importance of constant change in the life of a man alive. Nothing is constant and if something is forced to remain constant it loses its value and power along with the passing of time. There are no absolutes. There is only a constant flow and change and even change is not absolute. A man today is different from what he was yesterday and tomorrow he will be different from what he is today. A man loves a woman because of the constant change in her. It is the change that startles and defies and keeps a man and woman in love with each other. Loving an unchanging person is like loving an inanimate object like a pepper pot. But even amidst change one needs to maintain one’s integrity. However Lawrence says that putting a finger on one individual trait makes one as fixed as a lamp post. It seems as if a man has made up an idea about himself and is trying to trim himself down to fit into it. Lawrence says that one can learn about the importance of change from a novel. In a novel the characters do nothing but live. But if they begin to act according to a fixed pattern – always remaining good or bad – the novel loses its life force. Similarly a man in his life must live and not try to follow a pattern or else he becomes a dead man in life. Lawrence however says that it is difficult to define what is living. Different men have different ideas about what they mean by living in life. Some go to seek God while others seek money, wine, and women, yet others seek votes and political reforms. In this Lawrence says that the novel is a guide which helps to differentiate between a man alive and a man who is dead in life. A man may eat his dinner like a man alive or merely chew his dinner as a dead man in life. A man alive shoots his enemy but a dead man in life throws bombs at people who are neither his friends nor foes.

Finally Lawrence says that the most important thing is to be a whole man alive and the novel provides guidance in this matter. A novel helps a man to see when a man is alive and when he is dead in life. The novel helps to develop an instinct for life. This is because the novel does not advocate a right path or a wrong path. The concept of right and wrong vary according to circumstances. A novel portrays this unpredictable and varying nature of life making the reader realize that life itself is the reason for Why The Novel Matters| D.H. Lawrence | Summary and



Analysis

D. H. Lawrence’s critical essay ‘Why the novel matters’ was published in the collection titled Phoenix in the year 1936. In this essay Lawrence speaks about the importance of the novel and tries to establish the superiority of the novelist above other professions.

In an attempt to illustrate the importance of the novel Lawrence explains the importance of life and the living man. He says that the whole living man, the man alive, is more important than his thoughts, ideas, his mind, or his stomach or liver or kidney or any other parts of his body. Lawrence says that this is what scientists and philosophers fail to understand. According to Lawrence a novel shows life and its characters are nothing but man alive. The novelist understands the importance of life and the man alive. Therefore the novelist is better than the scientist or the philosopher.

Lawrence begins the essay by commenting upon the saying ‘a sound mind in a sound body’. He calls it a funny superstition that people think of themselves as a body with a soul in it. He questions why one thinks of one’s hand as something subordinate to the mind that operates it. The hand has a life of its own. It has knowledge and can think and act for itself. The hand is as much a part of the living man as the mind. The pen held by the hand however is not alive. A man alive extends only to his fingertips. Lawrence says that whatever in a man is alive constitutes the man alive. The hand, skin, freckles, blood and bones are very much alive and part of the man alive. The living body therefore must not be compared to inanimate objects like tin cans or clay vessels.

Lawrence in this essay tries to explain why the novelist is better than the philosopher or the scientist and in order to do so he explains the importance of the man alive. According to Lawrence the novelist possesses an intricate understanding of the man alive more fully than a parson, a philosopher, or a scientist. The parson speaks about souls in heaven and the afterlife. But for the novelist heaven is in the palm of his hand and the tip of his nose which are alive. The novelist is not concerned about life after death. He is wholly concerned about life at present and with the man alive. The philosopher speaks about infinite knowledge possessed by the pure spirit.  But for the novelist there is no knowledge beyond what the living body can perceive. For philosophers nothing but thoughts is important. These thoughts Lawrence says are nothing but ‘tremulations on the ether’. They are not alive. They are like radio signals floating in the air which are meaningless until they reach the receiver – a radio device that decodes the signals into a meaningful message. Similarly when thoughts are received by a man alive they become meaningful and can alter the man’s life. But the thoughts nevertheless are not alive. It is only because the man alive receives them that they become alive. Only a man alive can be stimulated by thoughts. Thus the living body is more important than the message conveyed by thoughts.

According to Lawrence nothing is more important than life. Living things are more valuable than dead objects. A living dog is better than a dead lion but a living lion is better than a living dog. Lawrence says that scientists and philosophers find it difficult to accept the value of the living. For the philosopher nothing but thoughts matter. For the scientist a living man is of no use. He only wants a dead man whom he dissects and observes under the microscope. For a scientist a man is a heart, a liver, a kidney, a gland or a tissue. But for the novelist the only thing that matters is a whole living man. Lawrence refuses to believe that he is a body or a soul or a brain or a nervous system. He considers himself to be a complete whole made up of all these parts, a whole that is greater and more significant than the individual parts. And for this reason he is a novelist and he considers himself superior to the saint, the scientist or the philosopher.  

Having established the importance of the man alive and the novelist Lawrence proceeds to explain the significance of the novel. Lawrence calls the novel a book of life. According to him books are like thoughts - nothing but ‘tremulations on the ether’. They are meaningful only when a man alive receives them. But he says that the tremulations of a novel are more powerful than any other book and it can make a whole man alive tremble. This means that the novel has the capacity to influence a man more effectively than any other book.  For example the ideals of Plato makes the ideal being in a man tremble. Similarly the sermons or the Ten Commandments affect only a part of a man alive. But a novel is capable of shaking the whole of a man alive. This is because a novel deals in nothing else but man alive. In this regard Lawrence calls the Bible a ‘great confused novel’.  All its characters – Adam, Eve, Sarai, Abraham, Isaac – including God are nothing but man alive. For Lawrence, the Bible, Homer and Shakespeare are all great novels because they communicate to the reader. Their wholeness affects the whole of man alive. They do not stimulate growth in a particular direction but shake the whole man alive into new life.

According to Lawrence the strength and appeal of a novel lies in the dynamic nature of its characters which reflects the importance of constant change in the life of a man alive. Nothing is constant and if something is forced to remain constant it loses its value and power along with the passing of time. There are no absolutes. There is only a constant flow and change and even change is not absolute. A man today is different from what he was yesterday and tomorrow he will be different from what he is today. A man loves a woman because of the constant change in her. It is the change that startles and defies and keeps a man and woman in love with each other. Loving an unchanging person is like loving an inanimate object like a pepper pot. But even amidst change one needs to maintain one’s integrity. However Lawrence says that putting a finger on one individual trait makes one as fixed as a lamp post. It seems as if a man has made up an idea about himself and is trying to trim himself down to fit into it. Lawrence says that one can learn about the importance of change from a novel. In a novel the characters do nothing but live. But if they begin to act according to a fixed pattern – always remaining good or bad – the novel loses its life force. Similarly a man in his life must live and not try to follow a pattern or else he becomes a dead man in life. Lawrence however says that it is difficult to define what is living. Different men have different ideas about what they mean by living in life. Some go to seek God while others seek money, wine, and women, yet others seek votes and political reforms. In this Lawrence says that the novel is a guide which helps to differentiate between a man alive and a man who is dead in life. A man may eat his dinner like a man alive or merely chew his dinner as a dead man in life. A man alive shoots his enemy but a dead man in life throws bombs at people who are neither his friends nor foes.

Finally Lawrence says that the most important thing is to be a whole man alive and the novel provides guidance in this matter. A novel helps a man to see when a man is alive and when he is dead in life. The novel helps to develop an instinct for life. This is because the novel does not advocate a right path or a wrong path. The concept of right and wrong vary according to circumstances. A novel portrays this unpredictable and varying nature of life making the reader realize that life itself is the reason for living. The end result of the novel is the whole man alive.  Thus Lawrence asserts that the novel is a book that can touch the life of a whole man alive and that is why the novel matters. living. The end result of the novel is the whole man alive.  Thus Lawrence asserts that the novel is a book that can touch the life of a whole man alive and that is why the novel matters. 


Don't Quit - Edgar Albert Guest

  Don't Quit Edgar Albert Guest When things go wrong, as they sometimes will, when the road you're trudging seems all uphill, ...